LegalBench-RAG: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domain
arXiv preprint; peer-reviewed venue not established
What it adds
Transforms existing legal annotations into retrieval queries with character-span targets.
Read with this limitation
Table 1 totals 6,858; Table 2 totals 6,889. ContractNLI counts differ (946/977).
- Jurisdiction tags
- United States
- Language
- English
Follow the source
Selected statements located in the linked primary sources. These results have not been independently reproduced here.
The corpus draws from ContractNLI, CUAD, MAUD and PrivacyQA.
3.1 and Table 1Experiments use the 776-query miniature benchmark, not the full corpus.
3.4; 4; Table 3
Connected research
Cites
CUAD: An Expert-Annotated NLP Dataset for Legal Contract Review
Converts clause annotations to retrieval targets.
Inspect the sourceRelated question
LeCaRDv2: A Large-Scale Chinese Legal Case Retrieval Dataset
Both evaluate retrieval for legal applications, using different retrieval units and relevance criteria.
Entry status, source edition & rights
- Index entry
- Source-linked summary, prepared with agent assistance. Independent scholarly review is pending.
- Archive admission
- This bibliographic entry does not confer admission to the versioned archive.
- Edition inspected
- 2408.10343v1
- Reading coverage
- Main sections 2–5 and Tables 1–7; tables 4–5 inspected as rendered pixels; author repository README and file tree.
- Rights
- External references only. Papers and research artifacts remain with their original hosts; their own terms apply.
- Entry updated
- 2026-10-15
Source-linked summary · independent assessment pending.