ILDC for CJPE: Indian Legal Documents Corpus for Court Judgment Prediction and Explanation

Vijit Malik, Rishabh Sanjay, Shubham Kumar Nigam, Kripa Ghosh et al.

All authors

Vijit Malik, Rishabh Sanjay, Shubham Kumar Nigam, Kripa Ghosh, Shouvik Kumar Guha, Arnab Bhattacharya, Ashutosh Modi

ACL-IJCNLP 2021

What it adds

Introduces an Indian Supreme Court corpus linking binary outcomes to case documents, with a small expert-annotated subset for studying explanations. It asks whether predictive models select the same supporting passages as legal readers.

Read with this limitation

Evaluation uses random splits and only 56 cases have expert explanations. Inputs are retrospective court documents with final-decision sections removed. Outcome prediction and passage selection therefore do not establish prospective case forecasting or legally valid reasoning.

Jurisdiction tags
India
Language
English

Follow the source

Selected statements located in the linked primary sources. These results have not been independently reproduced here.

  1. The main corpus contains 34,816 case documents.

    Table 1
  2. The dataset uses random, outcome-balanced validation and test splits rather than temporal splitting.

    Temporal Aspect
  3. Five legal experts annotated explanations for a separate 56-document test subset.

    Legal Expert Annotations
Entry status, source edition & rights
Index entry
Source-linked summary, prepared with agent assistance. Independent scholarly review is pending.
Archive admission
This bibliographic entry does not confer admission to the versioned archive.
Reading coverage
Publisher PDF inspected for corpus statistics, construction, splitting, expert annotations, model setup and ethical scope (PDF pages 1–5, 8 and 10). No experiments rerun. Author spelling follows PDF; Anthology expands Kripa Ghosh to Kripabandhu Ghosh.
Rights
External source links only. No paper full text or underlying dataset is mirrored by the site; downstream reuse requires checking the source licence.
Entry updated
2026-10-15

Source-linked summary · independent assessment pending.

Research updates

A monthly digest of selected legal AI papers, datasets and benchmarks, plus published research checks.